Sunday, April 23, 2006

My ошибка

That's Russian for "my bad". I forgot to mention, in my eagerness to celebrate Earth Day (said it's your Earth Day, it's my Earth Day too. Gonna have a good time, Happy Earth Day to you), that yesterday was the 136th anniversary of the birth of Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov Lenin. Sorry Comrade! Do you suppose it's just a coincidence that Earth Day was founded on the 100th anniversary of his birth? Phones lines are open at 1-800-COMMIES.

Sunday, April 22, 2007

Hooray for the rocks & the dirt

















I turned on the news this Earth Day morning and I noticed one Channel was highlighting all the Earth Day festivities around Central Iowa people could take in.

There's a good idea, driving to all the Earth Day events!

Last week Des Moines Mayor Frank Cownie drove by himself from one Gore-bull warming event in Ames to another in Des Moines.

He justified it by saying he drove a hybrid vehicle.

The scientific community is united in the fact it would have been better if he rode a bike.

Ah eco-nuts!

A couple of things that really irritate me about these phonies is that America is always the villain.

Is it coincidence that Earth Day falls on the birth date of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin?

Also, the eco-nuts never acknowledge the improvements made in the environment.

For example, In a previous post I mentioned the books I read in Maui.

One book, "The Only Game In Town" by Faye Vincent, had a story from one time Pittsburgh Pirate Ralph Kiner.

Kiner talked about his arrival in Pittsburgh in 1947 and how at 10 in the morning the smog and soot in the air was so bad that he though it was midnight.

Eco-nuts.

Gore-bull warming.

As V. I. Lenin said, "Useful Idiots".

Monday, April 21, 2008

Helping the cause?


Earth Day, like Al Gore, has expanded and the scientific community is united in that fact.

For more than a week various organizations have been putting on Earth Day activities.

I suppose driving to them over the course of a week is better ecologically than driving to all in one day.

I love the irony of the Register photograph, by Bill Neibergall, that shows a woman making a sign for Gore-BULL warming wearing a coat.

Also that this festival on Saturday was sparsely attended (160 people) because of poor weather conditions.

Read that as Fargin' Cold!

Sunday in Central Iowa started cloudy and cool, but the sun did eventually shine on Earth Day in the Junction.

This time 70 celebrants, as pictured in the Register photo by Justin Hayworth, drove a 25 mile course to show how much they love the Earth!

It was in hybrid-vehicles, such as the Toyota Prius, but the last time I checked they do utilize an internal combustion engine that requires fossil fuel.

















With friends like this, the Earth doesn't need enemies.

Sunday, April 22, 2012

I Just Want To Celebrate

The news is full of Earth Day activities, most of which don't take place on this day.

Friday Central Iowa held a Trash Bash and it was a good thing that the sun was shining on that day because rain would delay it 3 days.

There's some commitment to Mother Earth for you and the scientific community is united in that fact.

Valley Junction is holding Earth Day in the Junction 5K Run Walk, be sure to click for driving directions.


Eastern Iowa chose to kick off their Earth Week Fair yesterday, with three special workshops appropriate for adults, children, Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts.

That's an interesting breakdown.

One of the workshops is called “Get Geocaching!” and geocaching expert John Morgan gave the basics of the treasure-hunting game that’s played using GPS devices.

It looks like cars are required as simple caches are often called "drive-bys," or "park 'n grabs".

Another workshop was “What on Earth? Climate Change & Severe Weather Safety”.

This premise is completely wrong as “There is medium evidence and high agreement that long-term trends in normalized [property] losses have not been attributed to natural or anthropogenic climate change.” 

The Big Lug Nut was brought back into the news with a story on one of his pet projects, the Iowa Power Fund.

The BLN  called the program to support renewable energy research and development a resounding success by pointing to an algae production plant.

Algae? Isn't that President Obama's fuel of the future?

According to the BLN, the $4 million from the fund will grow substitutes for fish oil and proteins for feedstock.

Where's the power come into being?

Other Power Fund highlights(?) include, One company accidentally wasted most of its $1 million grant ordering equipment from an out-of-state supplier that went bankrupt and $2.8 million was spent studying a proposal to store wind energy that was later determined not to be feasible.

Don't forget the $19,000 given to Consumer Energy to study a plug-in hybrid electric car owned by Consumer Energy.

Results of the nearly two years of study found the plug-in battery used in the vehicle does not work well in the cold.

At the Statehouse two state senators got into a heated discussion about climate change, with Dummycrat Rob Boss Hogg playing the part of Al Gore -- “‘Scientists, including those representing 28 Iowa colleges and universities who recently released a statement, have warned us that changes in global climate patterns are brining more extreme weather events to Iowa, the United States and our world.’”

To which Republican Senator David Johnson responded -- “I’m on the side of the scientists I served with in Antartica and Greenland and I’m the only member of this body that has done that. And there is no agreement in the scientific community, no consensus that things have really changed because change happens.”

Johnson schooled the lawyer, who earned a master's degree in energy policy from the Hubert Horatio Hornblower...Humphrey Institute for Public Affairs.

Speaking of schooling, second grade students at Sunset Heights Elementary School in Webster City, and their teacher, will be on a Shower Strike this week.

They're promising to not take a shower or a bath until we’ve raised a thousand dollars to help build a well for a school in Kenya.

Here's hoping the winds blow out of the South until then.



Friday, May 20, 2011

At The Library


The Ragister ran pictures of an Earth Day celebration on May 18 at the Forest Avenue Library in Des Moines.

Check it out --

Earth Day at Forest Avenue Library

It seems to me that I read somewhere that Earth Day is April 22, every year since 1970 and the scientific community is united in that fact.

Someone couldn't look that up?

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Knockout By Marciano


CNN Meteorologist Rob Marciano was in agreement with me about President Obama's Earth Day trip to Iowa.

"Is that the 747 Air Force One I see on the tarmac getting ready to go fly to Iowa for Earth Day?"

"I mean, it's a pretty big carbon footprint just to make a speech in front of a windmill."

"C'mon, let's park the jumbo jet, just for Earth Day, Mr. President."

And the scientific community is united in that fact.


Wednesday, April 22, 2009

You Say It's Your Earth Day

It's nice of President Obama to jet in and out of Iowa on Earth Day.

Obama is expected to arrive in Des Moines at 11:30 a.m. and travel to Newton, Obama is expected to depart Iowa from Des Moines by 2:15 p.m.

Per The White House that is the only public event on the President's schedule today.

Because Barry cares, he's going green with the new Air Force One Hybrid.

And the scientific community is united in that fact.

As you can see it's 15-20% more efficient than regular Air Force One.

























Earth Day is my birthday too, Yeah --V.I. Lenin


Saturday, April 25, 2009

Don't Ya Jes' Love It


Out of the Union of Socialist Story County comes this article and picture...

ISU Earth Day marked by march

Earth Day 2009...spurred a group of about 25 students, faculty and staff to pick up their protest signs and march to ISU’s power plant.

The group, chanting, carrying banners and flanked by a dog and a cardboard Lorax from the environmental-themed children’s story by Dr. Seuss, was organized by members of ActivUS...

Note in the picture that a sign states, "I am the Lorax. I speak for the trees. I speak for the trees for they have no tongues."

Where the hell do these geniuses think their cardboard & paper signs come from?

The Lorax warned against mindless progress, well mindless fits with this group and the scientific community is united in that fact.

Oh, the Thinks You Can Think!

Saturday, April 22, 2006

First Earth Day

I remember taking part in this celebration? It was 1970 and a junior high socialist science class I was in decided we would paint trash barrels and set them up in the neighborhood around school. We were allowed class time for this project and of course we painted them funky, remember this was the age of original tie dye, earth day colors. I recall some sort of symbol too, a diamond I believe. The irony was we SPRAY PAINTED them! Damn the depletion of the ozone from aerosol cans.

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Be very very quiet


The Ragister has an article about a so called Day of Silence on Friday.

It is described as...

a nationwide event where middle school, high school and college students draw attention to the harassment experienced by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered students.

Just like Earth Day, it's not just one day in Des Moines and West Des Moines.

There is some controversy surrounding the event.

One student can't understand that...

"It's ridiculous. Why try to cancel something that's about bullying?" said Urbandale senior Quinn Merrill, 18. "It's their freedom of speech. If they don't want to talk, they don't have to..."

Well said, and the scientific community is united in that fact.

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt. --Mark Twain

Heheheheheh--Elmer Fudd

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

In the merry, merry month of May


If you're dyslexic it becomes Workers of the World UNTIE and the scientific community is untied in that fact.

If I were a conspiracy theorist I could make a case for how all these "wonderful" events are tied to Communists.

Earth Day was founded on the 100th anniversary of the birth of V.I. Lenin.

May 1st is a celebration of Labor and the day the Commies like to parade their military hardware.

I'm sure that's why so many Unions, during the late '40s and early '50s, had anti-communist pledges incorporated into their by-laws.

Today we'll see rallies for illegal immigrants and a protest of the enforcement of this country's immigration laws.

"The raids are intended to terrorize people and make President Bush look tough," said Joshua Hoyt, executive director of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights. "But they are not a solution."

Here's their solution, last year some illegal immigrants wore T-shirts saying "I'm illegal. So what?"

I saw a comment the other day that because we're all God's children and God made the land, there is no illegal immigrant.

By that logic, Because God made us imperfect...there can be no criminals or murderers.



Sunday, September 10, 2006

Take that Fiberal Moonbats

From CanadaFreePress.com

What the Left Never Will Understand About the War on Terror



by J.B. Williams

The first thing liberals fail to understand is that war is a serious business. If you are not prepared to take a side, you had better not stand in the middle of the battle field. Sit it out and remain silent, because the minute you speak, you have taken a side, whether you meant to or not, and if you speak against your own, you have chosen the wrong side. This error in judgment among liberals has earned them the current title of un-American or even Al Qaeda sympathizer.

Wrong from the start, the left actually thinks that the war on international terrorism is all about one man, one terror network, one event, one country and one day. How many liberals have you heard ask the question, "What about Bin Laden?" or, "What did Iraq do to us?" or, refer to Iraq as the "wrong war" in the "wrong place", a "departure from the war on terror" - a war which in their feeble minds, exists only in Afghanistan.

This notion is akin to suggesting that WWII was only about Pearl Harbor. Like Pearl Harbor, 9/11 was just a calling card, an invitation to engage in a much bigger (world) problem. Like Pearl Harbor, 9/11 was not our first invitation to engage in what was fast becoming a world-wide threat. Like Pearl Harbor, it was an invitation we couldn't afford to leave unanswered.

We received an invitation to the war on terror as far back as 1979 in Tehran. We received several more invitations throughout the 80's and 90's. We were invited in no uncertain terms in 1993, when Bin Laden first attempted to level the World Trade Towers. We were invited again in 1995 by Hezbollah in Saudi Arabia and yet again by Bin Laden in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998. We received yet another open invitation to join the war against international terrorism in October of 2000 with the bombing of the USS Cole, again, courtesy of Al Qaeda. Meanwhile, much of the free world was already engaged. We declined to answer any of these invitations...

We were not just patient in ignoring these invitations - we were cowardly and short sighted. Only when the invitation reached the massive intensity of 9/11, with nearly 3000 innocent American men, women and children dead, our financial center, defense center and government center under attack all at once, were we ready to accept these invitations.

A year before 9/11, the FBI had identified the New York Al Qaeda cell that would one year later, fly planes into the WTC, the Pentagon and even the White House, if not for the brave souls on Flight 93. But the Clinton administration looked at the threat as a "criminal" matter. That meant that the FBI and CIA could not share information concerning the New York cell and without proper warrants based on indisputable evidence, they did nothing...

One year later, that cell killed almost 3000 American citizens with apparent ease and liberals still contend today, that the war on terror is a "criminal" matter. They insist that the terrorists have civil rights and that our courts, filled with frivolous law suits, is the place to deal with this threat.

Despite numerous attacks and arrests all over the world, liberals still think that the war on international terrorism is limited to one man, Bin Laden, one network, Al Qaeda and one event, 9/11. Had we thought the same after Pearl Harbor, we would have leveled Japan and come home. Most of Europe would be speaking German and every Jew on earth would be baked to extinction. Most of the world would be living under communist rule and America would not be America today.

Yet the leftists in control of the once great Democratic Party fail to see reality. When they search for the enemy, they only see Bush. When they plot their military strategy, they only see defeat. When you ask them about terrorists, they think you are talking about American soldiers and when you ask for their victory plans, retreat is their answer. The retreat plan was tried in Vietnam and we are still trying to justify that decision today.

Prior to the Clinton administration, dangerous regimes like that in North Korea, Syria, China and Iran, had the desire but not the means to strike terror world-wide. By the time the Clinton's left office, both China and North Korea had long range nuclear warheads, Iran and Syria were working on it. But liberals will tell you that Bush made America less safe, answering the invitation and taking the fight to the enemy on their soil. Has there been another successful attack in the US that I am unaware of? Not that it can't still happen. That's really the point. It can still happen and if we don't get more serious about winning this war, it will.

The Hussein regime in Iraq had terrorized its citizens and neighbors throughout the 90's, broken every UN resolution ever written and played cat and mouse with UN inspectors until Hussein finally got bold enough to just toss them from Iraq, telling both Clinton and the UN to shove it. But according to leftists, they had Hussein "contained". Doing UN paper work I guess?

Today, as we head into the 2006 mid-term elections, liberals remind us that they have changed their collective minds about none of this. They still think the world wide war against international terrorism is about one man, one terror network, one country, one event and one day. They still believe it is a criminal matter for our police and our courts and they still insist that America, more specifically Bush and our military, are the real terrorists. They still believe that Bush lied, that Iranian, Syrian and Arabian terrorists killing innocent Iraqi citizens are just "civil insurgents" and that the central front in the war on terror, is a departure from the war on terror.

Now if you can sleep well at night with your families' lives in the hands of people like this, God Bless! Knock yourself out at election time. Vote yourself more money from the federal trough of socialist handouts and let the chips fall where they may on national security.

But if on the other hand, like me, you have something to lose, something worth fighting for, someone to pass this country on to in one piece, then pay attention...

Clearly, liberals don't get it. They don't like Bush's war because they can't begin to comprehend the very real world wide threat that Bush decided to confront on September 12, 2001. They don't get it because unlike the rest of us, they see more wrong than right with America and therefore, nothing worthy of defense. They won't fight because they don't know how and that limits their thinking to faux diplomacy via the most corrupt institution on earth, the United Nations.

They fear Bush more than Bin Laden. They trust those European nations that profited by keeping the most brutal regime on earth in business while holding the UN and US hostage as the international terror threat gathered global strength and reach. They trust the UN more than the US and firmly believe that we can negotiate peace with Muslim extremists willing to strap bombs on the chests of their grade school children and send them into a pizza parlor.

In short, liberals don't know anything at all about real American values or principles today and they know even less about what it takes to protect and preserve those principles and values for future generations. Therefore, the idea that they can be entrusted with upholding, protecting, defending and preserving the very principles that they spend every day attacking, is insane. But if insanity is your thing...go for it!

NO! They just don't get it... any of it - and apparently, no matter the mountain of evidence before them, they never will.

Those they have trained to be federal dependents will vote for them no matter what. Those who can't tell the difference between an American soldier and a real terrorist will vote for them too. Those who can't read a butterfly ballot will vote for them. So will those just released from prison and even those without a pulse.

People who believe that Americas "bubble of supremacy" needs to be "burst", like billionaire socialist and currency wrecker George Soros will fund them, as will Hollywood limousine liberals, New England ketchup queens and tree dwelling former draft-dodgers in the North West.

And that's why the rest of us better show up on Election Day...

JB Williams is a business man, a husband, a father, and a writer. A no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy. He is published nationwide and in many countries around the world. JB. Williams can be reached at: JBW@JB-Williams.com

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Under the Weather

I've had a cold and have been achy since Tuesday.

I thought I was getting better, but regressed yesterday.

So I'm under the weather...what the hell does that mean?

Isn't everyone, everyday(unless you're in space), under the weather?

It reminds me of a time, a few years ago, when I walked into a clothing store and heard a salesman say..."It's colder than hell."

It was January and it was cold.

Now I'm no Bible scholar, but I'm thinking isn't everyday colder than hell?

I guess I better brush up on hell because it appears that's where I'm headed for denying "Gore Bull" warming!

Ellen Goodman (her slave name?) opined that...By every measure, the U N 's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change raises the level of alarm. The fact of global warming is "unequivocal."

The certainty of the human role is now somewhere over 90 percent.

Which is about as certain as scientists ever get.

I would like to say we're at a point where global warming is impossible to deny.

Let's just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with Holocaust deniers, though one denies the past and the other denies the present and future.

How the hell do you make that cataclysmic leap?

First, and foremost, that's an insult to those who perished in the Holocaust and those who survived!

The Holocaust is a proven FACT!

"Gore Bull" warming ISN'T!

Where did the 90% figure come from? Out of her ass like the Holocaust statement?

As I stated yesterday, that per IPCC's own findings...man's role is so uncertain that there is a strong possibility that we have been cooling, not warming, the Earth.

That doesn't sound like 90% to me or even unequivocal!

Goodman then divides SCIENCE into Republican and Dummycrats...

There are astonishing gaps between Republican science and Democratic science.

Try these numbers:Only 23 percent of college-educated Republicans believe the warming is due to humans, while 75 percent of college-educated Democrats believe it.

I've been in the college classes with those Dummycrats, they take in every piece of bs that the professor feeds them and never challenge it!

I remember one time, before the prof got to class, one of my classmates asked what I was going to argue with the prof about that day.

I said it depended on whatever bs he was going to try and slide past us.

Another time a prof made an asinine statement and then asked for questions and comments.

I said I didn't agree with his theory and went on to explain my beliefs.

The prof said he didn't agree.

I replied I didn't ask you to agree, you asked for questions and comments.

I just though it important that these kids hear something other than the drivel you're pouring out.

But, I've digressed!

I'll interject an e-mail I received from my brother-in-law-Chris (the rocket scientist).

It comes from an article by James Lewis

Why Global Warming is Probably a Crock


The human-caused global warming hypothesis is completely model-dependent. We can't directly observe cars and cows turning up the earth thermostat. Whatever the human contribution there may be to climate constitutes just a few signals among many hundreds or thousands...

Scientists are always wrong --- they are just less wrong now than they were before (if everything is going well)...

Now there's a basic fact about complexity that helps to understand this. It's a point in probability theory (eek!) about many variables, each one less than 100 percent likely to be true...

Now imagine that all the variables about global climate are known with less than 100 percent certainty. Let's be wildly and unrealistically optimistic and say that climate scientists know each variable to 99 percent certainty! (No such thing, of course). And let's optimistically suppose there are only one-hundred x's, y's, and z's --- all the variables that can change the climate: like the amount of cloud cover over Antarctica, the changing ocean currents in the South Pacific, Mount Helena venting, sun spots, Chinese factories burning more coal every year, evaporation of ocean water (the biggest "greenhouse" gas), the wobbles of earth orbit around the sun, and yes, the multifarious fartings of billions of living creatures on the face of the earth, minus, of course, all the trillions of plants and algae that gobble up all the CO2, nitrogen-containing molecules, and sulfur-smelling exhalations spewed out by all of us animals. Got that? It all goes into our best math model.

So in the best case, the smartest climatologist in the world will know 100 variables, each one to an accuracy of 99 percent. Want to know what the probability of our spiffiest math model would be, if that perfect world existed? Have you ever multiplied (99/100) by itself 100 times? According to the Google calculator it equals a little more than 36.6 percent.

The Bottom line: our best imaginable model has a total probability of one out of three.

That's why human-caused global warming is an hypothesis, not a fact. Anybody who says otherwise isn't doing science, but trying to sell you a bill of goods.

I received his e-mail on February 7 and his conclusion was...

Unfortunately about 90% of the world's population don't study enough math or
science to understand this probability debate.

So that's where the 90% comes from!

Saturday, July 07, 2007

Rare Earth


I prefer mine medium well.

Get Ready, cause here it comes.

07/07/07 & Live Earth.

Don't they know it's the end of the world?

A Daily Mail investigation has revealed that far from saving the planet, the extravaganza will generate a huge fuel bill, acres of garbage, thousands of tonnes of carbon emissions, and a mileage total equal to the movement of an army.

The most conservative assessment of the flights being taken by its superstars is that they are flying an extraordinary 222,623.63 miles between them to get to the various concerts - nearly nine times the circumference of the world. The true environmental cost, as they transport their technicians, dancers and support staff, is likely to be far higher.

The total carbon footprint of the event, taking into account the artists' and spectators' travel to the concert, and the energy consumption on the day, is likely to be at least 31,500 tonnes of carbon emissions, according to John Buckley of Carbonfootprint.com, who specialises in such calculations.

Throw in the television audience and it comes to a staggering 74,500 tonnes. In comparison, the average Briton produces ten tonnes in a year.

The concert will also generate some 1,025 tonnes of waste at the concert stadiums - much of which will go directly into landfill sites.

Moreover, the pop stars headlining the concerts are the absolute antithesis of the message they promote - with Madonna leading the pack of the worst individual rock star polluters in the world.

Oh the hypocrisy!

Tweedle Dum Al (the 2nd), the father of Gore-bull warming, should be acting more like a father and trying to save his son (the 3rd).

I guess I shouldn't expect too much, his father (the 1st) was an asshole too and the scientific community is united in that fact.

Tweedle Dee Hellary weighed in on the concert...

"The scientific consensus is clear and overwhelming: we are causing the planet to warm, with potentially devastating consequences to ourselves and our children. We need to take immediate steps to address this problem, and I applaud everyone who is participating in Live Earth for demanding action..."

CON sensus is more like it.

In an article entitled...

Alarmist global warming claims melt under scientific scrutiny.

Many of the assertions Gore makes in his movie, ''An Inconvenient Truth,'' have been refuted by science, both before and after he made them.

Then there's this article...

Global warming debunked

Man's contribution to the greenhouse gases was so small we couldn't change the climate if we tried.

What about?

Oldest DNA ever recovered shows warmer planet

Scientists who probed two kilometers (1.2 miles) through a Greenland glacier to recover the oldest plant DNA on record said the planet was far warmer hundreds of thousands of years ago than is generally believed.

(Aaahh) Get ready, cause here I come (on my way)...

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Come Fly With Me


In a bigger flub than wasting nearly 9,000 gallons of fuel to fly in and out of Iowa on Earth Day, the Obama administration misspent $328,835 and ended up scaring the residents of New York City in an Air Force fly by.

Sadly, the best administration ever knew what it was doing...

Feds Knew NYC Flyover Would Cause Panic

Threatened Federal Sanctions Against NYPD, Secret Service, FBI & Mayor's Office If Secret Ever Got Out


Sounds like the Chicago way of doing business and the scientific community is united in that fact.

If its pictures they wanted, why not check Google Images?

I found the pic of Air Force One Hybrid there and others too, it has to be the most photographed plane in the world.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Fuel Of It


President Obama said the Environmental Protection Agency determined that carbon dioxide and other tailpipe emissions are harmful to the health and well-being of our people. So there's no question that we have to regulate carbon pollution in some way; the only question is how we do it.

Here's a thought, don't fly in and out of Iowa for Earth Day!

And the scientific community is united in that fact.

A CBS White House correspondent calculated the round trip on Air Force One and four trips on Marine One used at least 9,116 gallons of fuel.

For the believers, like Obama, jet engines burn fossil fuels and produce emissions that add to global warming. And they are spewed at higher altitudes, which increases the heat-trapping properties of the pollution, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Friday, April 27, 2007

So What Else Is New


Damn!

I missed the Dummycrat debate last night.

Actually, because I didn't watch it doesn't mean I missed it.

After all it was the "do as I say, not as I do crowd".

Want proof?

A flock of small jets took flight from Washington Thursday, each carrying a Democratic presidential candidate to South Carolina for the first debate of the political season.

...No one jet pooled, no one took commercial flights to save money, fuel or emissions.

As I recall, this week began with Earth Day and several candidates speaking out about "Gore-Bull" warming in Iowa.

Writing of Al Gore, here's his latest...

The sixth annual Tribeca Film Festival opened Wednesday night at a gala hosted by former Vice President Al Gore as the festival expanded its social mission with a slate of global warming-themed films.

The festival, which was founded after the Sept. 11 attacks to rejuvenate Lower Manhattan, opened with the premiere of nine short films produced by SOS (Save Our Selves), an organization to raise awareness on climate change.

I think SOS really stands for Same Old Shit.

And the scientific community is united in that fact.

Friday, April 22, 2011

Evergreen?





















On this 41st Earth Day, let's take a look at the latest with the green movement.

Al Gore, last week in Washington D.C. at Power Shift 2011, compared action on global warming to the Civil Rights movement.

Also in attendance were Van Jones and 10,000 young leaders (?) from across the country.

Attendees either took planes, trains, buses, cars or some other polluting device to reach their destination and the scientific community is united in that fact.


They then went out and protested against Coal and Big Oil.










In other green news...

Apple named 'least green' tech company

A company that Al Gore has served on the Board of Directors for since 2003.

In New York City, the U.N. tried to remove any record of its prediction of 50 million climate refugees by 2010 because they missed the mark by 50 million.

Locally, a major corporation's event is going green-err by utilizing another companies renewable energy credits to offset their carbon emissions.

“Subsidizing ‘good ‘ energy in order to justify ‘bad’ energy is like eating salad in order to justify eating dessert. It is an exercise in self-deception”.

No indication if it will include the planes used to fly everyone in, the complimentary new Cadillacs each participant uses while in town, or the vehicles required to transport workers and spectators.

Monday, April 22, 2013

That's The Way Of The World

Earth Day.

Hurray for the rocks and the dirt and the scientific community is united in that fact.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Mama Mia



President Obama learned nothing from his Earth Day trip to Iowa last year.

Obama and Joe Biden are both flying to New York City on separate planes, where they will land at separate airports to attend separate events within a few miles of each other.

That's not Green Force One or Two they're flying either and the scientific community is united in that fact.